<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long or Short Domain Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ingenuity.net.au/blog/2008/06/05/long-or-short-domain-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ingenuity.net.au/blog/2008/06/05/long-or-short-domain-names/</link>
	<description>Web Hosting Brisbane</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fordy</title>
		<link>http://www.ingenuity.net.au/blog/2008/06/05/long-or-short-domain-names/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>fordy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ingenuity.net.au/blog/?p=16#comment-378</guid>
		<description>I agree. 40 characters is too long, but there is some truth in the keywords appearing in the domain name. There are plenty of tools out, try checking out something like &lt;a&gt;Available Domain Names&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. 40 characters is too long, but there is some truth in the keywords appearing in the domain name. There are plenty of tools out, try checking out something like <a>Available Domain Names</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
